Now for some more
interesting, or entertaining, cases.
*GRIFTER GAME.
Sad Moment..(I
Need Your Help)..
Hello,
I'm
writing this with tears in my eyes, my family and I came down here to Manila, Philippine
for a short vacation and we were mugged at gun point last night at the park of
the hotel where we lodged, all cash and credit card were stolen off us but
luckily for us we still have our passports with us...
We've been to the Embassy and the Police here, but they're
not helping issues at all they asked us to wait for 3 weeks but we can't wait
till then and our flight leaves in few hours from now but we're having problems
settling the hotel bills and the hotel manager won't let us leave until we settle
the hotel bills, we are freaked out at the moment...Well I really need your
financially assistance...Please let me know if you can help us out. Write me
back so I can tell you how to get it to me.
That e-mailed plea for help went to scores of GreeneLanders. It went to people who were included in a list belonging to the ostensible sender: none
other than this county’s official historian, David Dorpfeld. It
was a hoax. The actual Dorpfelds
are safe and well. And solvent. And
literate.
*CENSURE CENSURED.
GreeneLand’s Board of Ethics has been convicted of unethical conduct. According to State Supreme Court judge Richard Platkin (as reported in The Daily Mail, 2/16/12), when the Board inflicted censure on New Baltimore town councilman Art Byas it “failed to abide by its own rules and regulations.”
The case originated with a compound complaint made in 2011 by town employees, who accused Mr Byas of failing to heed, promptly, a call to return or destroy his copy of a file of confidential personnel information that had been distributed inadvertently to several local officials, late in 2010, by Town Supervisor Susan O’Rorke. Mr Byas did not heed the call immediately, but by December, according to the town attorney, all recipients had done so.
The ethics panel--Michael G. Avella, chairman; Rosemarie Webb; Joseph Konopka—adjudged that when Mr Byas did not heed the call, immediately, he violated a provision of New Baltimore’s ethics code, prohibiting municipal officers from disclosing confidential information acquired during performance of official duties.
No recipient of disclosure was ever named.
Mr Byas challenged the board’s ruling, along with the aura of validity that Ms O’Rorke and some other town council members had bestowed on it. He accused the Board of Ethics of making its judgment on the basis of an inaccurate news article and without “making direct contact with me, or attempting to subpoena me.” (Ms O’Rorke claimed that Mr Byas “ignored” several chances to explain his actions to the ethics panel).
Judge Platkin ruled that the ethics board’s censure, being “devoid of legally sufficient proof,” and marked by “respondent’s failure to according petitioner the protections to which he is entitled by law,” is “vacated, annulled, and declared of no legal focus or effect.” (In the Daily Mail account, the last quoted word was affect).
The Board of Ethics reportedly issued a statement averring that the judge “misunderstood the facts and erroneously applied the law.” But no such statement, or any link to the county’s Board of Ethics, exists on the Greene County Government web site.
*NEGLIGENCE?
That web site offers, among other things, a list of
Departments, each with its e-mail address. Click the address for Treasurer and you get an
invitation to send an internet message to, ahem, Willis Vermilyea. Click
for Sheriff and, after being told that Gregory Seeley is the sheriff, you click what is identified as his
email address, you get a prospective mailing to Richard Hussey. With
regard to Mental Health, where Margaret Graham is listed as director, clicking her nominated
e-mail address yields a call to pkconrad. In the case of the
Industrial Development Agency, Sandy Mathes is identified as executive director; and clicking
on the link to his email address yields a prospective note to that
gentleman. But Mr Mathes left the
I.D.A. nine months ago. Mr Hussey
has not been sheriff since 2008.
Meanwhile, the county government’s link to “Press Releases” produces—and
has produced for several years—the message “No new releases.” So who, pray tell, is minding
GreeneLand’s official web site?
*STIEFEL STIFFS STAFF?
Charles Stiefel, former head of the multi-national Stiefel Laboratories (skin care products, with a production plant here in GreeneLand), is being accused by the federal Securities & Exchange Commission of defrauding company employees. In an action filed in Florida, the Commission contends that Stiefel and his sons kept employees in the dark about the imminent sale of the company to the pharmaceutical giant, GlaxoSmithKline. Before that deal was known to be in prospect, they offered to buy back private company shares that were owned by employees. According to the Commission, the Stiefels gave “misleading valuations” of those shares, buying back the units at about a third of what GSK soon afterward paid for them as part of a $2.9 billion purchase. The deception, according to the SEC, short-changed the employees to the extent of $110 million.
Charles Stiefel, former head of the multi-national Stiefel Laboratories (skin care products, with a production plant here in GreeneLand), is being accused by the federal Securities & Exchange Commission of defrauding company employees. In an action filed in Florida, the Commission contends that Stiefel and his sons kept employees in the dark about the imminent sale of the company to the pharmaceutical giant, GlaxoSmithKline. Before that deal was known to be in prospect, they offered to buy back private company shares that were owned by employees. According to the Commission, the Stiefels gave “misleading valuations” of those shares, buying back the units at about a third of what GSK soon afterward paid for them as part of a $2.9 billion purchase. The deception, according to the SEC, short-changed the employees to the extent of $110 million.
In addition to the SEC’s legal
action, the former chief financial officer of Stiefel Labs, along with three
other former company officers, is suing the Stiefels on grounds resembling
those cited in the SEC action for fraud.
At the time of the sale to
GSK, about 200 employees operated the Stiefel plant in Oak Hill. Among them, and since retired, was
Cairo town councilman William Carr Jr.
In response to a call from Seeing Greene, he identified himself as one of “many dozens” of former
shareholders who have a stake in the outcome (in 2013, perhaps) of the SEC’s
lawsuit.
P.S. Charles Stiefel was honored by
accountants Ernst & Young back in 1996 as Florida Enterpriser of the Year.
P.P.S. When the GSK takeover took place in
2009, closure of the Oak Hill Stiefel plant was announced. But a rescue operation that was led by
Sandy Mathes, who at the time was executive director of the county’s Industrial
Development Agency, induced the new owners to stay in Oak Hill, albeit with a
shift from making skin care products to making toothpaste. The inducements--tax
breaks, low-interest loans, cash grants--amounted to about $2 million.
(For more coverage of the Stiefel matter, see Scott Thrum, “SEC Sees Bitter Pill
at Drug Maker,” Wall Street Journal,
1/24/12).